Indiana
Indiana elects one prosecuting attorney in each of their 91 districts. All but one of those districts are comprised of a single county; the remaining district includes two counties. Prosecuting attorneys serve four-year terms.
QUICK STATS
•
91
DAs currently serving
•
4
-year terms
•
69.2
% uncontested elections
Note:
Indiana
uses districts, not counties, for elections. Thus, complete county data cannot be shown on this map.
Note: Texas uses both districts and counties for elections. Thus, complete county data cannot be shown on this map. The color-coding represented below displays Texas counties that are not part of a larger prosecutorial district. The unshaded areas represent district-based prosecutorial districts.
Filters
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
DISTRICT
YEAR
CANDIDATE
PARTY
INCUMBENT OR CHALLENGER
PRIMARY election
GENERAL election
more info
Marion
Marion
Marion
2018
Benjamin
Strahm
Rep
C
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
33.5
%
33.5
%
—
—
Marion
Marion
Marion
2022
Cynthia
Carrasco
Rep
C
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
40.6
%
40.6
%
—
—
Marshall
Marshall
Marshall
2014
E. Nelson
Chipman Jr.
Rep
O
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
Marshall
Marshall
Marshall
2018
E. Nelson
Chipman Jr.
Rep
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
Marshall
Marshall
Marshall
2022
E. Nelson
Chipman Jr.
Rep
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
Martin
Martin
Martin
2018
Aureola
Wright Vincz
Rep
C
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
65.8
%
65.8
%
—
—
Martin
Martin
Martin
2022
Aureola
Wright Vincz
Rep
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
52.7
%
52.7
%
—
—
Miami
Miami
Miami
2022
Jeffrey
Sinkovics
Rep
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
Monroe
Monroe
Monroe
2022
Erika
Oliphant
Dem
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
Montgomery
Montgomery
Montgomery
2014
Joseph
Buser
Rep
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
Montgomery
Montgomery
Montgomery
2018
Joseph
Buser
Rep
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
Montgomery
Montgomery
Montgomery
2022
Joseph
Buser
Rep
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
Morgan
Morgan
Morgan
2014
Steven
Sonnega
Rep
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
Morgan
Morgan
Morgan
2018
Steven
Sonnega
Rep
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
Morgan
Morgan
Morgan
2022
Steven
Sonnega
Rep
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
Newton
Newton
Newton
2014
Jeffrey
Drinski
Rep
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
Newton
Newton
Newton
2018
Jeffrey
Drinski
Rep
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
Newton
Newton
Newton
2022
Jeffrey
Drinski
Rep
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
Orange
Orange
Orange
2018
Holly
Hudelson
Rep
O
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
Orange
Orange
Orange
2022
Holly
Hudelson
Rep
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
Owen
Owen
Owen
2014
Donald
Vandermoere II
Rep
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
Owen
Owen
Owen
2018
Donald
Vandermoere II
Rep
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
Owen
Owen
Owen
2022
Donald
Vandermoere II
Rep
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
Pulaski
Pulaski
Pulaski
2014
Daniel
Murphy
Rep
O
65.6
%
65.6
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
Pulaski
Pulaski
Pulaski
2018
Daniel
Murphy
Rep
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
Pulaski
Pulaski
Pulaski
2022
Kelly
Gaumer
Rep
O
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
Putnam
Putnam
Putnam
2014
Timothy
Bookwalter
Rep
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
Putnam
Putnam
Putnam
2018
Timothy
Bookwalter
Rep
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
Putnam
Putnam
Putnam
2022
Timothy
Bookwalter
Rep
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
Randolph
Randolph
Randolph
2014
David
Daly
Rep
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
Randolph
Randolph
Randolph
2018
David
Daly
Rep
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
Randolph
Randolph
Randolph
2022
David
Daly
Rep
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
Shelby
Shelby
Shelby
2014
James Brad
Landwerlen
Rep
O
70.8
%
70.8
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
Shelby
Shelby
Shelby
2018
James Brad
Landwerlen
Rep
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
Shelby
Shelby
Shelby
2022
James Brad
Landwerlen
Rep
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
Spencer
Spencer
Spencer
2014
Dan
Wilkinson
Dem
C
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
53.6
%
53.6
%
—
—
Spencer
Spencer
Spencer
2018
Victor
Ippoliti
Rep
C
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
54.5
%
54.5
%
—
—
Spencer
Spencer
Spencer
2018
Dan
Wilkinson
Dem
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
45.5
%
45.5
%
—
—
Spencer
Spencer
Spencer
2022
Megan
Bennet
Rep
C
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
66.1
%
66.1
%
—
—
Spencer
Spencer
Spencer
2022
Dan
Wilkinson
Dem
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
33.9
%
33.9
%
—
—
St. Joseph
St. Joseph
St. Joseph
2014
Kenneth
Cotter
Dem
O
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
54.3
%
54.3
%
—
—
St. Joseph
St. Joseph
St. Joseph
2014
Jeffrey
Sanford
Rep
O
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
45.7
%
45.7
%
—
—
St. Joseph
St. Joseph
St. Joseph
2018
Kenneth
Cotter
Dem
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
St. Joseph
St. Joseph
St. Joseph
2022
Kenneth
Cotter
Dem
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
Starke
Starke
Starke
2014
Nicholas
Bourff
Dem
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
54.9
%
54.9
%
—
—