California
California elects one district attorney per county in nonpartisan elections. There are 58 counties in the state. District attorneys serve four-year terms.
QUICK STATS
•
58
DAs currently serving
•
4
-year terms
•
58.4
% uncontested elections
Note:
California
uses districts, not counties, for elections. Thus, complete county data cannot be shown on this map.
Note: Texas uses both districts and counties for elections. Thus, complete county data cannot be shown on this map. The color-coding represented below displays Texas counties that are not part of a larger prosecutorial district. The unshaded areas represent district-based prosecutorial districts.
Filters
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
DISTRICT
YEAR
CANDIDATE
PARTY
INCUMBENT OR CHALLENGER
PRIMARY election
GENERAL election
more info
Mariposa
Mariposa
Mariposa
2014
Thomas
Cooke
NP
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
Mendocino
Mendocino
Mendocino
2022
Charles
Eyster
NP
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
Monterey
Monterey
Monterey
2018
Jeannine
Pacioni
NP
O
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
Monterey
Monterey
Monterey
2022
Jeannine
Pacioni
NP
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
Orange
Orange
Orange
2018
Lenore
Albert-Sheridan
NP
C
3.8
%
3.8
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
Riverside
Riverside
Riverside
2014
Michael
Hestrin
NP
C
55.3
%
55.3
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
Riverside
Riverside
Riverside
2014
Paul
Zellerbach
NP
I
44.8
%
44.8
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
Riverside
Riverside
Riverside
2018
Lara
Gressley
NP
C
33.6
%
33.6
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
Riverside
Riverside
Riverside
2018
Michael
Hestrin
NP
I
66.4
%
66.4
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
Riverside
Riverside
Riverside
2022
Lara
Gressley
NP
C
22.6
%
22.6
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
Riverside
Riverside
Riverside
2022
Mike
Hestrin
NP
I
55.0
%
55.0
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
Riverside
Riverside
Riverside
2022
Burke
Strunsky
NP
C
22.5
%
22.5
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
Sacramento
Sacramento
Sacramento
2014
Maggy
Krell
NP
O
32.0
%
32.0
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
Sacramento
Sacramento
Sacramento
2014
Todd
Leras
NP
O
9.0
%
9.0
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
Sacramento
Sacramento
Sacramento
2014
Anne
Schubert
NP
O
57.0
%
57.0
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
Sacramento
Sacramento
Sacramento
2018
Noah
Phillips
NP
C
37.4
%
37.4
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
Sacramento
Sacramento
Sacramento
2018
Anne
Schubert
NP
I
62.6
%
62.6
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
Sacramento
Sacramento
Sacramento
2022
Thien
Ho
NP
O
57.0
%
57.0
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
Sacramento
Sacramento
Sacramento
2022
Alana
Mathews
NP
O
42.0
%
42.0
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
San Benito
San Benito
San Benito
2014
Candice
Hooper Mancino
NP
I
98.0
%
98.0
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
San Benito
San Benito
San Benito
2018
Candice
Hooper Mancino
NP
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
San Benito
San Benito
San Benito
2022
Joel
Buckingham
NP
C
59.4
%
59.4
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
San Benito
San Benito
San Benito
2022
Candice
Hooper Mancino
NP
I
40.6
%
40.6
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
San Bernardino
San Bernardino
San Bernardino
2014
Grover
Merritt
NP
C
38.4
%
38.4
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
San Bernardino
San Bernardino
San Bernardino
2014
Michael
Ramos
NP
I
61.6
%
61.6
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
San Bernardino
San Bernardino
San Bernardino
2018
Jason
Anderson
NP
C
52.2
%
52.2
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
San Bernardino
San Bernardino
San Bernardino
2018
Michael
Ramos
NP
I
47.8
%
47.8
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
San Bernardino
San Bernardino
San Bernardino
2022
Jason
Anderson
NP
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
San Diego
San Diego
San Diego
2014
Bonnie
Dumanis
NP
I
54.8
%
54.8
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
San Diego
San Diego
San Diego
2014
Terri
Wyatt
NP
C
10.5
%
10.5
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
San Diego
San Diego
San Diego
2018
Genevieve
Jones-Wright
NP
C
37.3
%
37.3
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
San Diego
San Diego
San Diego
2018
Summer
Stephan
NP
I
62.7
%
62.7
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
San Diego
San Diego
San Diego
2022
Summer
Stephan
NP
I
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
San Francisco
San Francisco
San Francisco
2015
George
Gascon
NP
I
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
98.2
%
98.2
%
—
—
San Francisco
San Francisco
San Francisco
2019
Chesa
Boudin
NP
O
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
35.7
%
35.7
%
—
—
San Francisco
San Francisco
San Francisco
2019
Leif
Dautch
NP
O
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
13.9
%
13.9
%
—
—
San Francisco
San Francisco
San Francisco
2019
Suzy
Loftus
NP
O
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
31.1
%
31.1
%
—
—
San Francisco
San Francisco
San Francisco
2019
Nancy
Tung
NP
O
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
19.3
%
19.3
%
—
—
San Francisco
San Francisco
San Francisco
2022
Maurice
Chenier
NP
O
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
4.3
%
4.3
%
—
—
San Francisco
San Francisco
San Francisco
2022
John
Hamasaki
NP
O
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
37.3
%
37.3
%
—
—
San Francisco
San Francisco
San Francisco
2022
Brooke
Jenkins
NP
O
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
46.0
%
46.0
%
—
—
San Francisco
San Francisco
San Francisco
2022
Joe
Veronese
NP
O
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
12.3
%
12.3
%
—
—
San Joaquin
San Joaquin
San Joaquin
2014
Gary
Hickey
NP
O
20.8
%
20.8
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
San Joaquin
San Joaquin
San Joaquin
2014
Tori
Salazar
NP
O
78.9
%
78.9
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
San Joaquin
San Joaquin
San Joaquin
2018
Tori
Salazar
NP
I
97.9
%
97.9
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
San Joaquin
San Joaquin
San Joaquin
2022
Ron
Freitas
NP
C
53.9
%
53.9
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
San Joaquin
San Joaquin
San Joaquin
2022
Tori
Salazar
NP
I
46.1
%
46.1
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
San Luis Obispo
San Luis Obispo
San Luis Obispo
2014
Tim
Covello
NP
O
43.7
%
43.7
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
San Luis Obispo
San Luis Obispo
San Luis Obispo
2014
Dan
Dow
NP
O
53.8
%
53.8
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
San Luis Obispo
San Luis Obispo
San Luis Obispo
2014
Paul
Phillips
NP
O
2.2
%
2.2
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
San Luis Obispo
San Luis Obispo
San Luis Obispo
2018
Mike
Cummins
NP
C
35.7
%
35.7
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
San Luis Obispo
San Luis Obispo
San Luis Obispo
2018
Dan
Dow
NP
I
64.3
%
64.3
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
San Luis Obispo
San Luis Obispo
San Luis Obispo
2022
Dan
Dow
NP
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
San Mateo
San Mateo
San Mateo
2014
Stephen
Wagstaffe
NP
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
San Mateo
San Mateo
San Mateo
2018
Stephen
Wagstaffe
NP
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—
San Mateo
San Mateo
San Mateo
2022
Stephen
Wagstaffe
NP
I
100.0
%
100.0
%
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
—
—